OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo): Quick Comparison
Both tools can capture leads. OptinMonster is our overall recommendation for conversion-focused campaigns that need detailed targeting, testing, analytics, and campaign management across websites. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) has strengths for bdow!, formerly sumo, offers popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page forms, exit-intent displays, social sharing, email integrations, a/b tests, and webhooks.
Why OptinMonster leads for conversion campaigns
- 700+ campaign templates across conversion use cases.
- Six core campaign formats, from popups to inline and fullscreen campaigns.
- Layered targeting for page, behavior, source, device, location, and ecommerce needs, based on plan.
- A/B testing, conversion analytics, and revenue attribution in one campaign workflow on eligible plans.
- TruLead email verification plus agency features such as subaccounts on higher tiers.
Where BDOW! (formerly Sumo) may fit better
BDOW!, formerly Sumo, offers popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page forms, exit-intent displays, social sharing, email integrations, A/B tests, and webhooks. Its quick setup and free or paid options can work well for creators and smaller sites.
BDOW! includes useful onsite engagement and social features. OptinMonster is the better fit when the priority is dedicated lead-generation campaigns, deeper behavior rules, revenue attribution, lead verification, and agency-level campaign management.
This comparison may contain affiliate links. If you purchase through an affiliate link, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo): both products help turn website visits into leads, but they approach campaign creation differently. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) is website popup and onsite conversion platform, while OptinMonster is a dedicated lead-generation and conversion platform that can serve WordPress, Shopify, and other website setups. Our recommendation is OptinMonster for teams that need to build, target, test, and measure campaigns across a marketing funnel.
This comparison looks at ten practical feature areas using current vendor product documentation rather than assuming every plan includes every feature. Start by reviewing OptinMonster’s official feature overview and BDOW! (formerly Sumo)’s official feature and pricing information, then confirm plan limits at checkout. The best choice depends on where your site runs, what your team needs to integrate, and whether campaign analytics matter as much as the popup design.
For pricing context, review the WPCrows deals archive and our WordPress deals archive. Introductory prices, campaign limits, eligible features, and renewals can change, so use the vendor checkout as the final source before buying.
Quick verdict: OptinMonster is the stronger all-round choice for a marketing team that wants targeted campaigns, testing, analytics, revenue attribution, and verified email leads in one system. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) remains a sensible option when bdow!, formerly sumo, offers popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page forms, exit-intent displays, social sharing, email integrations, a/b tests, and webhooks.
OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo) at a glance
| Feature | OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campaign formats | OptinMonster has six core campaign types, from popups and floating bars to inline, slide-in, fullscreen, and gamified campaigns. | BDOW! supports popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page takeovers, and exit intent. OptinMonster adds multiple campaign types in a dedicated conversion suite, including gamified fullscreens and inline campaigns. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Audience targeting | Rules can combine page, device, source, location, URL, cookie, and commerce conditions; exact rule availability depends on the plan. | BDOW! offers smart display rules and visibility controls. OptinMonster’s display rules include a broader set of visitor, traffic, and ecommerce conditions by plan. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Visitor behavior and exit intent | Use behavior-driven triggers such as exit intent, scroll, time, click, and eligible cart/form abandonment rules. | BDOW! supports timed, exit-intent, and scroll-based visibility. OptinMonster combines trigger types with advanced visitor segmentation and cart/form abandonment on eligible plans. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| A/B testing workflow | Test campaign creative and offers, then use the campaign reporting to decide what to keep; advanced availability depends on plan. | BDOW! can create tests between form variants. OptinMonster’s tests fit into a campaign-wide analytics flow and can compare campaign approaches. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Conversion measurement | OptinMonster offers conversion analytics and revenue attribution on eligible plans, connecting campaign activity with outcomes. | BDOW! has forms dashboard reporting and exports. OptinMonster adds conversion analytics and revenue attribution for tracking impact beyond form views. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Lead quality checks | TruLead adds email verification for leads captured through OptinMonster campaigns. | BDOW! collects emails and supports exports/integrations. OptinMonster’s TruLead adds email verification as a dedicated lead quality layer. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Marketing integrations | Connect campaigns to email and marketing tools; higher tiers add workflow options such as Zapier and webhooks. | BDOW! connects to email services and webhooks on paid plans. OptinMonster offers a broader campaign-focused integration set and higher-tier workflow connections. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Cross-platform deployment | OptinMonster works on WordPress, Shopify, and other websites, so a campaign strategy can follow the business across CMS platforms. | BDOW! can be installed on different websites. OptinMonster also supports multiple CMS platforms and centralizes campaign creation, so the choice is less about CMS reach and more about reporting and targeting depth. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Templates and launch speed | The vendor lists 700+ customizable campaign templates, giving teams starting points for multiple goals and formats. | BDOW! includes templates on premium plans. OptinMonster lists 700+ campaign templates across its campaign builder. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
| Team and agency operations | Higher-tier features include subaccounts, role-based account access, custom branding, and campaign organization tools. | BDOW! can support multiple sites by plan. OptinMonster’s higher tiers add subaccounts, role-based access, custom branding, and campaign organization built for client-facing teams. | OptinMonster for campaign breadth |
This is a use-case comparison, not a promise that one platform is the right purchase for every site. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) can be attractive when its packaging or WordPress workflow is already part of your setup. OptinMonster is the more complete choice for the conversion workflow described above, subject to the plan you select.
What BDOW! (formerly Sumo) does well
BDOW!, formerly Sumo, offers popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page forms, exit-intent displays, social sharing, email integrations, A/B tests, and webhooks. Its quick setup and free or paid options can work well for creators and smaller sites. Its strongest reason to choose it is a closer match to teams that want website popup and onsite conversion platform. That can reduce setup friction if the platform already fits your current site, email service, or workflow. Before choosing it over OptinMonster, check whether your current plan covers the targeting, testing, and reporting you expect to use. See BDOW! (formerly Sumo)’s official feature and pricing information for the vendor’s current product details.
10 features where OptinMonster stands out
1. Campaign formats: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| OptinMonster has six core campaign types, from popups and floating bars to inline, slide-in, fullscreen, and gamified campaigns. | BDOW! supports popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page takeovers, and exit intent. OptinMonster adds multiple campaign types in a dedicated conversion suite, including gamified fullscreens and inline campaigns. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins when a marketer wants multiple onsite campaign formats managed in one campaign builder. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) also covers useful onsite messaging, but the difference is that OptinMonster combines campaign types with its targeting and measurement tools.
2. Audience targeting: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| Rules can combine page, device, source, location, URL, cookie, and commerce conditions; exact rule availability depends on the plan. | BDOW! offers smart display rules and visibility controls. OptinMonster’s display rules include a broader set of visitor, traffic, and ecommerce conditions by plan. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins for marketers who need layered audience rules rather than a basic page include/exclude setting. The practical advantage over BDOW! (formerly Sumo) is the ability to align the trigger, audience, and offer in one campaign setup instead of treating each rule as a separate popup setting.
3. Visitor behavior and exit intent: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| Use behavior-driven triggers such as exit intent, scroll, time, click, and eligible cart/form abandonment rules. | BDOW! supports timed, exit-intent, and scroll-based visibility. OptinMonster combines trigger types with advanced visitor segmentation and cart/form abandonment on eligible plans. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins for a conversion campaign that needs the trigger and audience segment to work together. For a lead-generation program, that combination helps the marketer match the message to the visitor’s intent. Confirm which campaign and targeting options are included in your chosen plan.
4. A/B testing workflow: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| Test campaign creative and offers, then use the campaign reporting to decide what to keep; advanced availability depends on plan. | BDOW! can create tests between form variants. OptinMonster’s tests fit into a campaign-wide analytics flow and can compare campaign approaches. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins when testing is part of an ongoing conversion program instead of an occasional form experiment. Testing is useful only when you can learn from the outcome. OptinMonster’s integrated workflow makes it easier to iterate on an offer, creative, or campaign strategy.
5. Conversion measurement: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| OptinMonster offers conversion analytics and revenue attribution on eligible plans, connecting campaign activity with outcomes. | BDOW! has forms dashboard reporting and exports. OptinMonster adds conversion analytics and revenue attribution for tracking impact beyond form views. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins when the marketer needs to evaluate campaign value beyond impressions or form views. This matters to teams who need to explain the impact of onsite campaigns to a sales or ecommerce team, not just report how many popups appeared.
6. Lead quality checks: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| TruLead adds email verification for leads captured through OptinMonster campaigns. | BDOW! collects emails and supports exports/integrations. OptinMonster’s TruLead adds email verification as a dedicated lead quality layer. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins when reducing invalid email submissions is part of the acquisition workflow. That gives teams a specific control for list quality rather than relying only on downstream email cleanup.
7. Marketing integrations: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| Connect campaigns to email and marketing tools; higher tiers add workflow options such as Zapier and webhooks. | BDOW! connects to email services and webhooks on paid plans. OptinMonster offers a broader campaign-focused integration set and higher-tier workflow connections. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins for teams that want campaign capture connected to a wider marketing stack. This is a practical advantage when a visitor’s opt-in must reach the right email service, CRM, or automation step quickly.
8. Cross-platform deployment: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| OptinMonster works on WordPress, Shopify, and other websites, so a campaign strategy can follow the business across CMS platforms. | BDOW! can be installed on different websites. OptinMonster also supports multiple CMS platforms and centralizes campaign creation, so the choice is less about CMS reach and more about reporting and targeting depth. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins when the same team needs campaigns on more than one website platform. Campaigns can follow a brand that has a WordPress blog, a Shopify store, and other web properties without forcing the whole setup into one CMS.
9. Templates and launch speed: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| The vendor lists 700+ customizable campaign templates, giving teams starting points for multiple goals and formats. | BDOW! includes templates on premium plans. OptinMonster lists 700+ campaign templates across its campaign builder. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins for teams prioritizing speed from campaign idea to a tested first draft. A large, organized library shortens the first-draft stage and gives teams more starting points to test.
10. Team and agency operations: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
| OptinMonster | BDOW! (formerly Sumo) |
|---|---|
| Higher-tier features include subaccounts, role-based account access, custom branding, and campaign organization tools. | BDOW! can support multiple sites by plan. OptinMonster’s higher tiers add subaccounts, role-based access, custom branding, and campaign organization built for client-facing teams. |
Feature winner for a conversion-focused campaign: OptinMonster. OptinMonster wins for agencies and teams that manage campaign operations across several sites. This can reduce the operational overhead of separating campaign work by brand or client.
Pricing and total cost
OptinMonster’s public pricing page lists plans with different campaign-impression allowances, feature access, and site counts; it states that subscriber counts are not charged as a separate fee. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) uses its own pricing model, which may be based on sites, traffic, a bundled suite, features, or usage. Avoid comparing only the first-year headline price: include renewals, campaign exposure or pageview limits, required add-ons, and the number of websites you need. Check both vendors’ current pricing before committing.
| Cost item | What to compare |
|---|---|
| Billing | Monthly versus annual billing and renewal price |
| Usage | OptinMonster campaign impressions versus BDOW! (formerly Sumo)’s sites, sessions, pageviews, or feature limits |
| Included features | Targeting, A/B testing, reporting, integrations, and lead quality tools |
| Scale | How many websites, brands, and users need access |
Who should choose OptinMonster?
- Marketers who want advanced targeting and behavioral campaigns without building custom code.
- Businesses running lead generation across WordPress, Shopify, or multiple website platforms.
- Teams that need A/B testing, conversion analytics, and revenue attribution together.
- Agencies that manage multiple client sites and need account roles or subaccounts.
- Businesses that care about email lead verification and list quality.
- OptinMonster vs Getsitecontrol
- OptinMonster vs ConvertBox
Who should choose BDOW! (formerly Sumo)?
BDOW! includes useful onsite engagement and social features. OptinMonster is the better fit when the priority is dedicated lead-generation campaigns, deeper behavior rules, revenue attribution, lead verification, and agency-level campaign management. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) is also worth a closer look if its existing site integration, bundle, or cost structure is a deciding factor. Get a trial or build one test campaign if available, then check the real workflow before moving an active campaign.
Final verdict: OptinMonster vs BDOW! (formerly Sumo)
OptinMonster is our recommended winner for marketers who want to grow leads and improve onsite conversion in a repeatable way. Its campaign formats, targeting rules, A/B testing, conversion analytics, revenue attribution, 700+ templates, and TruLead verification form a more complete lead-generation workflow than a popup tool evaluated only on whether it can display an offer. Select the plan that includes the triggers and reporting you actually need.
BDOW! (formerly Sumo) can still be the right choice if its product model is a better fit for your stack—especially when bdow!, formerly sumo, offers popups, embeds, sticky bars, full-page forms, exit-intent displays, social sharing, email integrations, a/b tests, and webhooks. For an online business that wants a dedicated campaign system and room to test offers, audiences, and timing, OptinMonster is the stronger overall recommendation. Read the WPCrows deals archive and verify terms on the official checkout.
Our recommendation: OptinMonster for conversion-focused campaign growth.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, OptinMonster or BDOW! (formerly Sumo)?
OptinMonster is our overall pick for marketers who want advanced campaign targeting, campaign analytics, revenue attribution, and email verification in one lead-generation platform. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) may be a better fit if its WordPress-native workflow, CRM, pricing, or specific feature matches your current stack.
Is BDOW! (formerly Sumo) a good OptinMonster alternative?
BDOW! (formerly Sumo) can be a good alternative when its workflow or platform model matches your website. Compare the campaign types, targeting rules, integrations, traffic limits, and renewal terms you actually need before switching.
Does OptinMonster work with WordPress?
Yes. OptinMonster can be connected to WordPress, and its campaign builder is managed through the OptinMonster account. You can create and target campaigns without requiring the site to be built with a particular page builder.
Can I use OptinMonster on a non-WordPress site?
Yes. OptinMonster supports WordPress, Shopify, and other websites through its platform integrations or embed options. Check the current setup instructions for your CMS before purchasing.
Does BDOW! (formerly Sumo) support A/B testing?
BDOW! (formerly Sumo) offers testing capabilities according to its current product documentation, though the available test types and plan requirements vary. Compare whether you can test campaign copy, design, triggers, and audience rules.
Is OptinMonster better for exit-intent popups?
OptinMonster has its Exit-Intent feature and combines it with page and visitor targeting rules on eligible plans. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) may also offer exit intent, so compare supported devices, trigger conditions, and plan access.
How do OptinMonster and BDOW! (formerly Sumo) pricing compare?
OptinMonster’s plans and introductory offers can change; its pricing page shows billing and campaign-impression allowances. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) may price by sites, sessions, pageviews, features, or a bundled license, so compare renewal costs and usage limits.
Can I use OptinMonster and BDOW! (formerly Sumo) together?
You may be able to run both, but overlapping popups can create a poor visitor experience and complicate attribution. If you test both, use separate pages or campaigns and check that frequency rules do not conflict.
Which is better for ecommerce?
OptinMonster supports ecommerce targeting and revenue-focused campaigns on eligible plans. BDOW! (formerly Sumo) may have useful store integrations or cart rules too; test the actual product, cart, checkout, and abandoned-visitor scenarios before deciding.
What should I test before choosing?
Build the same signup and exit-intent campaign in both products. Compare mobile display, page targeting, integrations, analytics, speed on your own site, plan limits, renewal price, and what happens to campaigns if you cancel.
More WordPress lead generation comparisons
Continue comparing popup, lead capture, and marketing tools with our WordPress deals archive and these related OptinMonster comparisons:
Related OptinMonster comparisons
Continue comparing lead-generation tools: OptinMonster vs OptiMonk · OptinMonster vs Poptin · OptinMonster vs Sleeknote · OptinMonster vs Wisepops · OptinMonster vs HubSpot Exit Intent Forms. See the WPCrows deals archive for current pricing status.
